![]() Please Wait... |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protocol OverviewBrowse » Domains » Social Environments » Social Networks » Social Networks Note: Some Protocols contain images. You may click the thumbnails to preview the full image. To print Protocols with full size images, please add those Protocols to your Toolkit and Generate a Report.
Social Networks #211101
Protocol Release Date
![]() ![]() May 31, 2016 Protocol Name From Source
![]() ![]() Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study (INMHS), 1990-1991 Description of Protocol
![]() ![]() The Important and Health Matters Social Network Battery is an interviewer-administered survey that captures the names of all individuals within a respondent’s social network and the relationship between these individuals. The high-burden protocol is a semistructured interview that has both open-ended and close-ended questions. On average, it takes 15–20 minutes to complete because individuals usually provide 4–7 names. Specific Instructions
![]() ![]() Note that this measure yields potentially identifiable data about the participant(s). The investigator should refer to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules regarding potentially identifiable data, which will provide guidance on who may access the data and how they may do so. Given HIPAA concerns, researchers should consider what level of identification is needed on network ties. In one-time data collections, interviewers can use first names or initials. However, in panel studies, these approaches run into trouble because respondents tend not to remember the nicknames, initials, and pseudonyms they gave in earlier waves. It is essential that the interviewer ask for all names and list them on the interview form (or suggested separate Network Recording Form) before asking and coding items 2-11 on the form. Protocol
![]() ![]() Social Networks – Important Matters 1. From time to time, most people discuss IMPORTANT MATTERS with other people, and we need people we can depend on for help. These can be family, friends, people who have been really helpful to you—what we are interested in are the ones that you are most likely to talk to about really important matters in your life, whether they live near you or far away. Who are the people in your life with whom you discuss important matters? Who are the people you can really count on? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 2. Is there anyone who always wants to talk to you about your important matters in your life whether you want them to or not? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 3. Are there people who are, in general, a burden to you, because they want to discuss matters important to them, even if you don’t? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 4. Have there been any important changes in this recently? In other words, were there people whom you used to discuss important matters with that you would not or no longer talk to about such things? These could be people whom you no longer feel close to, who might have moved or died. Who are they? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM Social Networks – Health 5. I’m interested in the people in your life that you talk to about health problems when they come up. Who are the people that you discuss your health with or you can really count on when you have physical or emotional problems? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 6. Who are the people, whether or not you have mentioned them before, who are always talking about your mental and physical health and trying to get you to do things about them? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 7. Are there people who are, in general, a burden to you because of their emotional or physical health problems and always want to talk to you about their problems, whether you want them to or not? ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM 8. Have there been any important changes in any of these lists? In other words, were there people whom you used to discuss health issues with or that you would rely on for help that you would not or no longer talk to about such things? These could be people whom you no longer feel close to, who might have moved or died. ► RECORD NAMES ON NETWORK FORM Network Recording Form 2) From which name generator was this person mentioned? CODES: I = Important Matters H = Health B = Both 3) Which name generator section? ► Circle all that apply CODES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6) How are you connected to this person? ► USE CARD A; RECORD ALL THAT APPLY 7) How close are you to this person? CODES: 1 = Very close 2 = Sort of close 3 = Not very close 8) How often do you see or talk to the person? CODES: 1 = Often 2 = Occasionally 3 = Hardly ever 9) Do they trust doctors to take care of people’s problems? CODES: 1 = A lot 2 = Most of the time 3 = Not very much 8 = Don’t know/unsure 10) Has this person done any of the following for you or helped you out? ► HAND FUNCTION CARD B; RECORD ALL THAT APPLY…. PROBE: WHAT ELSE? 11) Does this person hassle you, cause you problems, or make your life difficult? CODES: 1 = A lot 2 = Sometimes 3 = No/Not really
Density Matrix ► USE MATRIX FORM, FILL IN NAMES: Please think about the relations between these people you told me about earlier. Some of them may be total strangers in the sense that they wouldn’t recognize one another if they bumped into each other on the street. Others may know each other a bit, or they may be especially close. First, think about (1) and (2). How close are they to one another: 1 = Very close 2 = Sort of close 3 = Not very close 4 = Don’t know each other 8 = I don’t know
Scoring Instructions Size of Social Network: Add up the number of individuals mentioned in Important Matters (IM) (Item A1) alone, Health Networks (HN) (Item B5) alone, or combined for Overall Network (ON). Recent research (Perry & Pescosolido, 2010) suggests that influence may be specific (e.g., health matters affect health outcomes). Density = number of cells in density matrix scored 1–3 divided by the total number of filled-in cells in the density matrix. This measure provides a measure of the tightness or interconnectedness of the respondent’s network. This can be computed for the total network or separately for the IM and HN. Composition of Social Network: typical computed variables include percentage kin, percentage female, percentage similar age, percentage coworkers, percentage neighbor. Each of these can be constructed on the basis of IM or HN alone or the combined ON. Similar variables can be constructed for Functionality (column 1) and Problem (column 11) on the Network Recording Form. To get a sense of the "tightness of the network," four measures can be computed: 1) Density 2) Averaged Closeness – Information from column 7 is added and divided by the number of ties (reverse code before averaging for variables to indicate greater closeness). 3) Frequency of Contact – Constructed variables include percentage seen often on the average frequency, constructed and recoded as indicated for Average Closeness. 4) Interactive Terms – Both social network theory and research (Pescosolido, Brooks-Gardner, & Lubell, 1998; Pescosolido, Wright, Alegria, & Vera, 1998) suggest that structural network variables may have interactive effects on outcomes (e.g., size x closeness). However, caution must be exercised in the construction and interpretation of these variables (see cites above for more information and sample coding). Variables ![]() ![]()
Selection Rationale
![]() ![]() The Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study (INMHS) protocol was selected because it is a readily available measure of social networks used in research settings that assesses respondents’ ties on which they rely for help with health-related and other matters. This battery incorporates a slight modification of the well-known Important Matters battery developed on the General Social Survey and is widely used in social network research. The INMHS adds a battery specific to health, includes negative as well as positive ties, and also provides data on validity. Source
![]() ![]() U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Mental Health, Institute for Social Research, & Indiana University. (1991). Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study (INMHS), 1990-1991. Bloomington, IN: Institute for Social Research. Life Stage
![]() ![]() Adult Language
![]() ![]() English Participant
![]() ![]() Adults, aged 18 years and older Personnel and Training Required
![]() ![]() The interviewer must be trained to conduct personal interviews with individuals from the general population. The interviewer should be trained to prompt respondents further if a "don’t know" response is provided. Equipment Needs
![]() ![]() These questions can be administered in a computerized or noncomputerized format (i.e., paper-and-pencil instrument). Computer software is necessary to develop computer-assisted instruments. The interviewer will require a laptop computer or handheld computer to administer a computer-assisted questionnaire. Standards
![]() ![]()
General References
![]() ![]() Perry, B. L., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2010). Functional specificity in discussion networks: The influence of general and problem-specific networks on health outcomes. Social Networks, 32(4), 345-357. Pescosolido, B. A., Brooks-Gardner, C., & Lubell, K.M. (1998). How people get into mental health services: Stories of choice, coercion and "muddling through" from "first-timers." Social Science and Medicine, 46(2), 275-286. Pescosolido, B., & Wright, E. (2004). The view from two worlds: The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1795-1806. Pescosolido, B. A., Wright, E. R., Alegria, M., & Vera, M. (1998). Social networks and patterns of use among the poor with mental health problems in Puerto Rico. Medical Care, 36(7), 1057-1072. Stein, C. H., Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (1995). Assessing the social networks of people with psychiatric disability from multiple perspectives. Community Mental Health Journal, 31, 351-367. Wright, E. R., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2002). "Sorry, I forgot": The role of recall error in longitudinal, personal networks studies. Social Networks and Health, 8, 113-129. Mode of Administration
![]() ![]() Interviewer-administered questionnaire Derived Variables
![]() ![]() None Requirements
![]() ![]()
Process and Review
![]() ![]() The Expert Review Panel #2 (ERP 2) reviewed the measures in the Demographics, Environmental Exposures, and Social Environments domains. Guidance from ERP 2 includes: No significant changes to measure Please cite use of the PhenX Toolkit as: http://www.phenxtoolkit.org - April 11, 2017, Ver 21.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Site maintained by RTI International
Home | Browse | Search | My Toolkit | Feedback
Release: April 11, 2017, Ver 21.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Please Wait...


Add this protocol to My Toolkit